Ironically, though, by problematizing the canonical boundaries of cultural production and production culture, hyperperformativity creates a liminal postfuturist space in which text, hypertext, and hypotext collide, the hypotext in(sub)stantiating a semiotic dis-sociation of the text and its target, just as the postmodern hypertext is constructed as semaphoring a linkage of the text to the target: the hypertext correlates; the hypotext segregates.
But this hypotextual segregation is in itself a form of integration. To take a concrete example: consider the problem of "whitespace" familiar to many artists of the Postfuturist Project. Whitespace in a cultural production, like any exclusionary dialectic, constructs a power relation between separator and separation (it is indeed a meta-dialectic, reflexively self-problematizing in nature), and hence attempts through its "priority" to order the space in which it "exists". But simultaneously it constructs a superspace undermining the hegemonic discourse of tokens external to the whitespace; it further problematizes the line-arity/hyperline-arity created by its correspondant hypertext. This is the hypotext, which both stabilizes and interrogates the hypertext.
Hyperperformativity embraces this hypotextual space through its imbrication of performativity and textuality, resulting in a semiotic field predicated on and consequent with "both" the hypertext and the hypotext, a field which is, in fact, the text itself; hyperperformative textuality thus encompasses both the signifier/signified and the constructor/construction, thereby making it the ideal medium for inscribing postfuturist meaning.
Return to the PFP home page | Last modified 5/13/98 |